User:Emily.patashnik/Pelagia noctiluca/Savanna.deer Peer Review
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
Emily.patashnik
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- Pelagia noctiluca
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Pelagia noctiluca
Evaluate the drafted changes
editLead
-lead was not edited
Content
-The new content that was added was easy to understand and concise. Content is information that is not readily available - which is good because now the average person who doesn't know much about inverts. will have a better time understanding how this type of jelly eats! The only think I would add is to fix the citation at the end of the paragraph and maybe add a diagram labeling the parts of the stomach (if possible). Otherwise, great edit!
Tone and Balance
-Tone is neutral through the entire page
Sources and References
-Sources come from research done by scientists showing true real life answers. All accurate information
Organization
-Content is concise and easy to read - someone who is not familiar with the topic will understand it easily!
-No spelling or grammatical errors noted
Images and Media
-No images or media