User:ElMagyar/Four point flexural test

Go back to my main page

Link to the official wikipedia article: Four point flexural test

The four point bending flexural test provides values for the modulus of elasticity in bending $E_{f}$ , flexural stress $\sigma _{f}$ , flexural strain $\varepsilon _{f}$ and the flexural stress-strain response of the material. This test is very similar to the three point bending flexural test. The major difference being that the addition of a 4th bearing brings a much larger portion of the beam to the maximum stress, as opposed to only the material right under the central bearing.

This difference is of prime importance when studying brittle materials, where the number and severity of flaws exposed to the maximum stress is directly related to the flexural strength and crack initiation.

It is one of the most widely used aparatus to characterize fatigue and flexural stiffness of asphalt mixtures ^[1]

Testing method edit

The test method for conducting the test usually involves a specified test fixture on a universal testing machine. Details of the test preparation, conditioning, and conduct affect the test results. The sample is placed on two supporting pins a set distance apart and two loading pins placed at an equal distance around the center are lowered from above at a constant rate until sample failure.

Calculation of the flexural stress $\sigma _{f}$

\sigma _{f}={\frac {3FL}{4bd^{2}}}

for a rectangular cross section

in these formulas the following parameters are used:

$\sigma _{f}$ = Stress in outer fibers at midpoint, (MPa)
$F$ = load at a given point on the load deflection curve, (N)
$L$ = Support span, (mm)
$b$ = Width of test beam, (mm)
$d$ = Depth of tested beam, (mm)

Advantages and Drawbacks edit

Advantages of three-point and four-point bending tests over uniaxial tensile tests include:

simpler sample geometries
minimum sample machining is required
simple test fixture
possibility to use as-fabricated materials^[2]

Disadvantages include:

more complex stress distributions through the sample

Application with different materials edit

Ceramics edit

Ceramics are usually very brittle, and their flexural strength depends on both their inherent toughness and the size and severity of flaws. Exposing a large volume of material to the maximum stress will reduce the measured flexural strength because it increases the likelihood of having cracks reaching critical length at a given applied load. Values for the flexural strength measured with four-point bending will be significantly lower than with three-point bending.^[3]

Composite materials edit

Plastics edit

Standards edit

ASTM C1161: Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Advanced Ceramics at Ambient Temperature
ASTM D6272: Standard Test Method for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials by Four-Point Bending
ASTM C393: Standard Test Method for Core Shear Properties of Sandwich Constructions by Beam Flexure
ASTM D7249: Standard Test Method for Facing Properties of Sandwich Constructions by Long Beam Flexure
ASTM D7250: Standard Practice for Determining Sandwich Beam Flexural and Shear Stiffness

References edit

^ Pais & Harvey (Eds) (2012). Four Point Bending. Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 978-0-415-64331-3.
^ Davis, Joseph R. (2004). Tensile testing (2nd ed.). ASM International. ISBN 978-0-87170-806-9.
^ ASTM C1161-13, section 4: http://www.astm.org/Standards/C1161.htm

Category:Materials testing Category:Mechanics

[pais1-1] Pais & Harvey (Eds) (2012). Four Point Bending. Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 978-0-415-64331-3.

[davis1-2] Davis, Joseph R. (2004). Tensile testing (2nd ed.). ASM International. ISBN 978-0-87170-806-9.

[3] ASTM C1161-13, section 4: http://www.astm.org/Standards/C1161.htm

[1]

[2]

[3]