There is an article by Miguel A. Estrada, an attorney at Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, in the July 10, 2009 edition of the LA Times that states this:
What you'll learn is that the Honduran Constitution may be amended in any way except three. No amendment can ever change (1) the country's borders, (2) the rules that limit a president to a single four-year term and (3) the requirement that presidential administrations must "succeed one another" in a "republican form of government."
That is fairly firm. Or are you arguing that Zelaya wanted to change the country's borders or the republican form of government.EduardoT (talk) 20:50, 17 July 2009 (UTC)EduardoT