Is the Dialectic a model of advancing civilization?
Is it possible that, since no two humans are exactly the same, that our emerging complexity is a progressive result of root cause - our origin? And if there is an equation for advancement; must it include what constitutes civilization represented in each unique individual? And, in turn, is each of our representation of individual civilization adding to this external representation of civilization - a 'sum of the parts'?
"Parts". Are we charged patterns or patterned charge?.. hence the paradox of Dialectic progress. Do two simple organisms work together to create three or more? Is contraction necessary in order to advance expansion? Is expansion necessary in order to advance contraction?
Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. Grand Unified Theory. Did Max Planck affect quark behavior relative to his state each spacetime he interacted/negotiated with the quarks? Vacillation or oscillation? What effects are we the cause of relative to our state in what spacetime? Are each of us negotiating with each other in order to re-unify?.. only to expand again?
Thank you for doing your part, your best....which is? --Dialectic 05:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC)