I believe in a Every TREE in SIBERIA-type Wikiphilosophy.


Based on Daniel575's comment(It should be pointed out that Daniel has now been indef blocked for sending death threats), I propose that if there's substantial information on an subject, then it should have an article. Be that article on anything from a village fete that has raised money every year for the past three years to, yes, a tree in Siberia. Note though, if there isn't sufficient information on someone, then that article shouldn't exist. This may be seen as a very liberal interpretation of WP:NOTABLE.

This philosophy, however, only applies to the main namespace. Personally, the fewer stuff in the Wikipedia namespace, the better, as far as I'm concerned. I'm somewhat of a fire-breathing deletionist when it comes to stuff in Wikipedia:. People who bleat about community-building fail to realise that it's a community of editors, not gamers. If you want to create games for a community, Newgrounds is that way.

Regarding the User: namespace, I take a much more lenient view. Unless something is disrupting the Wikipedia or making a WP:POINT, I'm cool with it.