Hi my name is Danielle and I am creating my first wiki user page.

Margaret Anne Stanley (HPV work) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Stanley_(virologist) Anne Dell (biochemist specializing in carbohydrates/glycobiology) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_Dell

Further Research:

Univ of Cambridge Dept of Pathology site - https://www.path.cam.ac.uk/directory/margaret-stanley

more info from Univ of Cambridge website - https://www.immunology.cam.ac.uk/Networkdirectory/mas1001@cam.ac.uk

International Papillomavirus Society website - http://ipvsoc.org/member/margaret-stanley/

Primary Prevention of Cervical Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Resource-Stratified Guideline. (2017) - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29094100

Preventing cervical cancer and genital warts - How much protection is enough for HPV vaccines? (2016) - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27211079

HPV vaccination for victims of childhood sexual abuse. (2015) - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673615007576?via%3Dihub

Host responses to infection with human papillomavirus. (2014) - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24643178

Depletion of HPV16 early genes induces autophagy and senescence in a cervical carcinogenesis model, regardless of viral physical state. (2013) - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23913724

Epithelial cell responses to infection with human papillomavirus.(2012) - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22491770 (has charts too!)

Peer Edits edit

Hello!

I just wanted to say that your article is excellent overall! I just have a few minor suggestions that I think could improve it.

Strengths:

  • Variety of sources
  • Clear, concise use of language
  • Not too technical

Improvements:

  • Split up Career/Research section to make it more digestible
  • Go through and link more words that need to be defined
    • (ex. CD4(+) T cell-dominated Th1 response)
  • Add an image of her, her work, a paper of hers, or anything available to help include visuals
  • Reword some sentences for clarity
    • (ex. "She is a proponent of HPV vaccination pre-puberty, as when administered when the child is 13 years old, by the time the child is in their 20s it has been able to generate a high enough concentrations of antibodies to fight the virus")
  • Possibly add more information about her life? (childhood, important life experiences, etc.)

Peer Edit #2:

Hi!!

Wow I really liked this article !! here are few things that came to my mind while reading this article:

Clarity, easy to understand

I think the article is clear and easy to understand.

Recommendations for organization, new sections or subsections, order, or location of content

I believe if the research and career are separated it would be better for the reader to navigate through the article. Also, for the career it would be helpful if the years were in separate paragraphs like this:

From 2000-2003, she was a member of the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) and has, since then, served on multiple UK Research Council committees.

From 2004-2010, she served on the Spongiform Encephalopathies Advisory Committee (SEAC).

and the gap between 2010-2017 can be filled by writing dates for each of her career accomplishments.

What other information would you like to know? What questions do you still have about the topic?

I'd like to know more about her education, the schools she went to, if she had shown interest in science starting from a certain age IF these information are available.

Are there any terms that need definition, more information, or can be linked to other wiki pages.

I think if some of the words in her research topics are defined it would be more helpful to the reader. For example these words can be linked: "She papillomavirus, immunodeficient, immunosuppressant and other new words in her research topics.

Is all the information relevant, not excessive, need to be on this page.  Too much repeated from other pages?

I think all the information is relevant.

Recommendations for speaking in a scientific tone; scientifically accurate, but not too technical.

I think the parts about her life are easy enough to understand, and the research topics will get easy to understand if some words get linked so the reader can check them out.

How can images be improved, or what images would help clarify the page

Possibly an image of her? :)

Grammar

I fixed some grammar which I think was missing (some typos)