User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/Open Science Summit 2011/Open access



Open Access is an important step on the way towards open science edit

What actually is Open Access? edit

  • Allen, L.; Jones, C.; Dolby, K.; Lynn, D.; Walport, M. (2009). Scherer, Roberta W. (ed.). "Looking for Landmarks: The Role of Expert Review and Bibliometric Analysis in Evaluating Scientific Publication Outputs". PLoS ONE. 4 (6): e5910. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005910. PMC 2695409. PMID 19536339.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)  
  • Ziegler, A.; Kunth, M.; Mueller, S.; Bock, C.; Pohmann, R.; Schröder, L.; Faber, C.; Giribet, G. (2011). "Application of magnetic resonance imaging in zoology". Zoomorphology. doi:10.1007/s00435-011-0138-8.  
  • Anyone interested in automating that?

Licensing is key edit

  • Wikimedia uses a CC BY-SA license
  • In terms of reusability at Wikimedia, simple access rights are not enough
  • Anything licensed with a -NC or -ND clause cannot go onto Wikimedia

Open Access Week edit

Wikimedia and Open Access edit

 
Part of a figure in an open-access article, which gave rise to multiple reuses on wikis.
Normal adult cortical surface (left), polymicrogyria (center) and lissencephaly (right).
  • Reuse