User:DVSnell/Takizawa Bakin/Bibliography

Bibliography

As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:

Is the source from a reliable publication?
- Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
- Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
Is the source verifiable?
- In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
- Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
- For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
- Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
- Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
- Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
- Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
- In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
- Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
- Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
- Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about living persons. Please follow these carefully.
- Wikipedia has a series of guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.

If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.

Get Help

Bibliography

This is where you will compile the bibliography for your Wikipedia assignment. Add the name and/or notes about what each source covers, then use the "Cite" button to generate the citation for that source

Will Hedberg

Zolbrod, Leon M. 1967. Takizawa Bakin, New York: Twayne, 1967. ^[1]
- A biography written and edited by preeminent researchers of Literature and Asian Studies.
Atherton, David C. "The Author as Protagonist: Professionalizing the Craft of the Kusazōshi Writer." Monumenta Nipponica, vol. 75 no. 1, 2020, p. 45-89. doi:10.1353/mni.2020.0001^[2]
- References several of Bakin's Letters and diaries in English.
Dowdle, Brian C. "Why Saikaku Was Memorable but Bakin Was Unforgettable." The Journal of Japanese Studies, vol. 42 no. 1, 2016, p. 91-121. doi:10.1353/jjs.2016.0009^[3]
- Looks at Bakin's work after his passing and examines his continued popularity/relevance.
Ueda, Atsuko. “The Production of Literature and the Effaced Realm of the Political.” The Journal of Japanese Studies, vol. 31, no. 1, The Society for Japanese Studies, 2005, pp. 61–88. doi:10.1353/jjs.2005.0029^[4]
- An examination of the critique of Bakin's work and its role in "modern" Japanese Literature.
Walley, Glynne. "Gender and Virtue in Nansō Satomi hakkenden." Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, vol. 72 no. 2, 2012, p. 337-371. doi:10.1353/jas.2012.002^[5]
- Dismantles the concept of gender-based didactics in Bakin's most famous work.
Zolbrod, Leon. “Yomihon: The Appearance of the Historical Novel in Late Eighteenth Century and Early Nineteenth Century Japan.” The Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 25, no. 3, [Cambridge University Press, Association for Asian Studies], 1966, pp. 485–98, https://doi.org/10.2307/2052003^[6]
- Historical detail of the genre Bakin most wrote for.
Zwicker, Jonathan. "Playbills, Ephemera, and the Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Japan." The Journal of Japanese Studies, vol. 35 no. 1, 2009, p. 37-59. Project MUSE, doi:10.1353/jjs.0.0048^[7]
- Discusses Bakin's non-fiction writings such as biographies of his

References

^ Zolbrod, Leon (1967). Takizawa Bakin. New York: Twayne Publishers, Inc. LCCN 67-12269. OCLC 625222.
^ Atherton, David C. (2020). "The Author as Protagonist: Professionalizing the Craft of the Kusazōshi Writer". Monumenta Nipponica. 75 (1): 45–89. doi:10.1353/mni.2020.0001. ISSN 1880-1390.
^ Dowdle, Brian C. (2016). "Why Saikaku Was Memorable but Bakin Was Unforgettable". The Journal of Japanese Studies. 42 (1): 91–121. doi:10.1353/jjs.2016.0009. ISSN 1549-4721.
^ Ueda, Atsuko (2005). "The Production of Literature and the Effaced Realm of the Political". The Journal of Japanese Studies. 31 (1): 61–88. doi:10.1353/jjs.2005.0029. ISSN 1549-4721.
^ Walley, Glynne (2012). "Gender and Virtue in Nansō Satomi hakkenden". Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies. 72 (2): 337–371. doi:10.1353/jas.2012.0020. ISSN 1944-6454.
^ Zolbrod, Leon (1966-05). "Yomihon: The Appearance of the Historical Novel in Late Eighteenth Century and Early Nineteenth Century Japan". The Journal of Asian Studies. 25 (3): 485–498. doi:10.2307/2052003. ISSN 0021-9118. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
^ Jonathan Zwicker (2009). "Playbills, Ephemera, and the Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Japan". The Journal of Japanese Studies. 35 (1): 37–59. doi:10.1353/jjs.0.0048. ISSN 1549-4721.

[1] Zolbrod, Leon (1967). Takizawa Bakin. New York: Twayne Publishers, Inc. LCCN 67-12269. OCLC 625222.

[2] Atherton, David C. (2020). "The Author as Protagonist: Professionalizing the Craft of the Kusazōshi Writer". Monumenta Nipponica. 75 (1): 45–89. doi:10.1353/mni.2020.0001. ISSN 1880-1390.

[3] Dowdle, Brian C. (2016). "Why Saikaku Was Memorable but Bakin Was Unforgettable". The Journal of Japanese Studies. 42 (1): 91–121. doi:10.1353/jjs.2016.0009. ISSN 1549-4721.

[4] Ueda, Atsuko (2005). "The Production of Literature and the Effaced Realm of the Political". The Journal of Japanese Studies. 31 (1): 61–88. doi:10.1353/jjs.2005.0029. ISSN 1549-4721.

[5] Walley, Glynne (2012). "Gender and Virtue in Nansō Satomi hakkenden". Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies. 72 (2): 337–371. doi:10.1353/jas.2012.0020. ISSN 1944-6454.

[6] Zolbrod, Leon (1966-05). "Yomihon: The Appearance of the Historical Novel in Late Eighteenth Century and Early Nineteenth Century Japan". The Journal of Asian Studies. 25 (3): 485–498. doi:10.2307/2052003. ISSN 0021-9118. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

[7] Jonathan Zwicker (2009). "Playbills, Ephemera, and the Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Japan". The Journal of Japanese Studies. 35 (1): 37–59. doi:10.1353/jjs.0.0048. ISSN 1549-4721.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]