Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
(provide username)
Curti485
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Curti485/Max_Caulfield?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- Max Caulfield
Evaluate the drafted changes
edit(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)
I can tell that a ton of time went into this wiki project for this group which is very impressive. I think that all of the edits made to current headings hold value and are important additions. Editing a whole section about comic series adds to the history and context of this video game and it's relevance in the video game world.
Really great work on secondary sources, wiki relies on these so it's super important that they're integrated into all of our projects.
Though there was no media added, I think that might've been the right choice. This is simply because everything it takes to add media/images to a wiki article and the time frame of half of a semester to make that happen. I think that with such a popular and robust topic, this group did a really good job at prioritizing what was important and really honing in on that.