There was a list, here, where I gave my personal impressions and evaluations of the current candidates of the 2012 elections for the Arbitration Committee.
I have had, however, numerous requests on- and off- wiki to run again; and the arguments for giving the voters a wide selection of candidates are persuasive. While I have not yet decided either way, it seemed eminently unfair to continue to give endorsements or objections to candidates while I am considering whether to run myself.
For the record, and because I worked really hard on it, here is my planned statement for Newyorkbrad if he decides to run again:
- Newyorkbrad conformat ad omnis meos indiciis. Hic est vere bonum arbiter, et quo concilium fundamentum sanis in adhaerent. Scribit nimium tamen.
I don't think my endorsement is unfair even if I do end up running. Everybody loves Brad anyways, and the only reason he might not get elected is if decides to take a break from Arbitration – and then again, only because our election process doesn't allow write-in candidates. :-) — Coren (talk) 01:54, 18 November 2012 (UTC)