|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| Main | Talk | Contributions | Guestbook | Articles | GA Reviews |
This is a list of Good Article Reviews I have done or that I am currently working on.
- Microsoft Gaming -
Passed - Community Notes - Passed
- Elijah Wood - Passed
- Mars Society - Passed
- Jigglypuff - Passed
- Sans (Undertale) - Passed
- Illustrating Tolkien - Passed
How I review Good Articles edit
Here is the template I use when reviewing Good Article Nominations:
Raw template data
|
|---|
'''Last updated:''' {{#time:H:i, j F Y|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP|{{FULLPAGENAME}}}}}} (UTC) by {{REVISIONUSER}}
'''Estimated finish date:''' {{#time:F j, Y|+7 days}}
'''Status:''' {{Reviewing}}
{{Progress bar|0|height=6|text=reviewed}}
See '''[[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|what the criteria are]]''' and '''[[Wikipedia:What the Good article criteria are not|what they are not]]'''
1) '''Well-written'''
:{{GAIconList/icon|}} 1a) the prose is clear, concise, and [[WP:Make technical articles understandable|understandable to an appropriately broad audience]]; spelling and grammar are correct
:{{GAIconList/icon|}} 1b) it complies with the [[WP:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] guidelines for [[WP:Manual of Style/Lead section|lead sections]], [[WP:Manual of Style/Layout|layout]], [[WP:Manual of Style/Words to watch|words to watch]], [[WP:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction|fiction]], and [[WP:Manual of Style/Embedded lists|list incorporation]]
2) '''[[WP:Verifiability|Verifiable]]''' with '''no original research'''
:{{GAIconList/icon|}} 2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with [[WP:FNNR|the layout style guideline]]
:{{GAIconList/icon|}} 2b) [[WP:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] are [[WP:Inline citation|cited inline]]. All content that [[Wikipedia:Content that could reasonably be challenged|could reasonably be challenged]], except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
:{{GAIconList/icon|}} 2c) it contains [[WP:No original research|no original research]]
:{{GAIconList/icon|}} 2d) it contains no [[WP:Copyright violations|copyright violations]] or [[WP:Plagiarism|plagiarism]]
3) '''Broad in its coverage'''
:{{GAIconList/icon|}} 3a) it addresses the [[WP:Out of scope|main aspects]] of the topic
:{{GAIconList/icon|}} 3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see [[WP:Summary style|summary style]])
4) '''Neutral:'''
:{{GAIconList/icon|}} 4) '''[[WP:Neutral point of view|Neutral]]''': it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
5) '''Stable:'''
:{{GAIconList/icon|}} 5) '''Stable''': it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing [[WP:Edit warring|edit war]] or content dispute
6) '''Illustrated''', if possible, by '''media''' such as [[WP:Images|images]], [[WP:Videos|video]], or [[WP:Audio|audio]]
:{{GAIconList/icon|}} 6a) media are [[WP:File copyright tags|tagged]] with their [[WP:FAQ/Copyright|copyright statuses]], and [[WP:Non-free use rationale guideline|valid non-free use rationales]] are provided for [[WP:Non-free content|non-free content]]
:{{GAIconList/icon|}} 6b) media are [[MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE|relevant]] to the topic, and have [[WP:Manual of Style/Captions|suitable captions]]
'''Overall''': {{GAIconList/icon|}}
===Comments from first read-through:===
<!-- ⚠️ IMPORTANT ⚠️: If you are replying to a specific comment I left during my review, kindly follow these steps (for more general answers, you may put it at the very top of this section, by replying by my "starting this review" message:
Find the line where you would like to answer me. From there, you have two options:
Either put a status template like {{Done}} or answer using one of the following templates:
: [Your Message] [[User:Cocobb8|'''<span style="color:purple">Coco</span><span style="color:green">bb8</span>''']] (💬 [[User talk:Cocobb8|talk]] • ✏️ [[Special:Contributions/Cocobb8|contribs]]) 15:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
* [Your Message] [[User:Cocobb8|'''<span style="color:purple">Coco</span><span style="color:green">bb8</span>''']] (💬 [[User talk:Cocobb8|talk]] • ✏️ [[Special:Contributions/Cocobb8|contribs]]) 15:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
-->
|
Last updated: 14:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC) by Cocobb8
Estimated finish date: May 15, 2024
Status: 
Reviewing...
0% reviewed
See what the criteria are and what they are not
1) Well-written
1a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
- 1b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
2) Verifiable with no original research
- 2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
- 2b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
- 2c) it contains no original research
- 2d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism
3) Broad in its coverage
- 3a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
- 3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
4) Neutral:
- 4) Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
5) Stable:
- 5) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio
- 6a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
- 6b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
Overall: 