Here mainly to tidy up bad numbers. There are lots of them about. Numbers are facts. You wouldn't assert that "George Washington was a horse and ate only mangoes" because you read it on The Onion, would you? So why report that two-thirds of children born in an advanced early modern society died before age five when it's patently absurd? Or claim that British population grew by 3% a year in 1851-1901 by comparing England in one year with the whole of the UK (then including Ireland as well as Scotland and Wales) in the other? If numbers aren't important enough to you to verify them (which doesn't mean just finding one that's been regurgitated by some hack writer) and get them right, then just leave them out - no harm done. It's really that simple. Chiffrephile (talk) 15:39, 22 June 2015 (UTC)