User:Cfarmer4/Opioid epidemic/Samuel Raaflaub Peer Review
Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
Cfarmer4
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Cfarmer4/Opioid_epidemic?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
- opioid epidemic
Evaluate the drafted changes
editminimal additions to the article are made so I will be reviewing the article. The lead isn't written as well as it could be. I does give a nice description of opioids and the harms that they can cause. However, it does not reference many of the topics in the article such as the adolescents, canada, other countries, or treatment. The contents of the article is well written and organized. The article looks to have many relevant and up to date sources that are making contributions. There are things that could be talked more in depth about within the article such s other demographics besides women and children. Behavioral causes and outcomes or opioid abuse could be written about ( did you know that a large amount of heroin overdoses happen when drug is taken in a location that is not normal for the abuser due to the opponent processing theory).