An RfC has been held, and I've voted for it, with the note that it includes "implicitly the removal of all individually crafted recall processes to ensure a level playing field." This personal process is valid until the closure of that RfC. After that I will default to whatver the outcome of the RfC may be, whether it's a universal recall process or none. Cabayi (talk) 13:30, 9 April 2021 (UTC)


This recall process is not perfect and is subject to change, but I will try to follow it to the best of ability.

Criteria edit

  • You must have attempted to communicate resolving the issue with me privately or on-wiki.
  • You must have been an editor for >2 years, must have >2000 live edits and must be an editor in good standing (no blocks or bans in the past 6 months).
  • Any two editors and one administrator of your choosing who meet the above criteria must agree with your recall request. The editors can be administrators as well.
  • Any two of the following administrators must agree with your recall request: KrakatoaKatie, Amorymeltzer, QEDK, Creffett, Galobtter and TonyBallioni.
  • Any two of the following non-administrators must agree with your recall request: Serial Number 54129, 1997kB, Usernamekiran, Yngvadottir, Buidhe and Bonadea.
  • Once the quorum of 9 editors (7 people + 1 filer + 1 recallee) is established, move on to the process below.

Process edit

If you meet the above criteria, I will file a request to WP:Administrators' noticeboard. Any person apart from the filer and recallee will be responsible for clerking and closing the request. If two-thirds (or more) editors agree with the proposition to remove my toolkit, I will resign my tools "under a cloud" (meaning I will need to regain admin permissions through another RfA). If the AN discussion is not supported by the super-majority defined above, status quo will be maintained w.r.t. my adminship rights. Alternatively, I might choose to directly file a reconfirmation RfA.