My reflection essay Anthony Spataro
Critiquing articles: I listened to what my peers aid and fixed what I had to. My peers gave helpful advice and when I saw what they said I realized adding it to my own paper would help a lot. I took the same route in reviewing others articles; I do not care about hurting feelings you have to tell them how it is so they can succeed. I made sure to check over my peers because they either had small contributions or nothing sourced so I told them to fix it. Summarizing your contributions: I did my own article about modern cyber security. I feel as I brought a different spin or point of view to the previous articles and covered things they did not have in them. My article rounded out the preventions of cyber attacks in modern cyber security Peer review: What did your peers recommend you change on your article? My peers liked my article; they just told me to remove a sentence which was, you could ay bias. I was talking about how business need cyber security more than regular consumers but that is not always true so I removed it. Feedback: Did you receive feedback from other Wikipedia editors, and if so, how did you respond to and handle that feedback? I did not receive ay feedback with my article. Wikipedia generally: What did you learn from contributing to Wikipedia? How does a Wikipedia assignment compare to other assignments you've done in the past? How can Wikipedia be used to improve public understanding of our field/your topic? Why is this important? I learned that Wikipedia can easily have fake news or become manipulated; but with the right people and motives it can be a great repository of knowledge. It is important to understand cyber security because since everything is shifting towards computers and technology, it is creating a whole new realm of possibilities for criminals. It helps you become safe in this new and exciting era of technology.