User:Andrewa/Interleaving etc

What some others have said

in no particular order

• FWIW, the interleaving above (fragmenting of another's comment with interstitial sub-responses out of timestamp order) reminds me of why I so, so, strongly prefer to see folks just give a referential quote instead (e.g. ".. regarding "Blah bla bla ...", etc., ...") in their own separate following comment, if needed for clarity. While I imagine it may seem cohesive to two editors whose minds were involved in a direct exchange while forming such, I find it obfuscating (or at least awkward) for third-parties like myself to come by and parse it after-the-fact [1] (emphasis on "interleaving" added)
• WP:stringing seems an obscure guideline routinely ignored, so I don’t feel bound by it... [2]
  • The multi-dots produced by the previous post are your fault, not mine... [3]
• RfC close at WT:Talk page guidelines and resulting edit to the guideline

Examples

• [4] Exactly the sort of interleaving I find helpful!
• another such.