User:Aliciab5334/Regina Gwynn/Anthonyn256 Peer Review
![]() | Peer review
Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: LeadGuiding questions:
ContentGuiding questions:
Tone and BalanceGuiding questions:
Sources and ReferencesGuiding questions:
OrganizationGuiding questions:
Images and MediaGuiding questions: If your peer added images or media
For New Articles OnlyIf the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
Overall impressionsGuiding questions:
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.
Additional Resources |
General info
edit- Whose work are you reviewing?
(Aliciab5334)
- Link to draft you're reviewing
- User:Aliciab5334/Regina Gwynn - Wikipedia
- Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
Evaluate the drafted changes
editArticle Strengths
edit- Natural tone
- Mutiple sources of information
- Great information Structure
- all information is backed up by resource
- links work
- spelling and grammar
Areas of opportunity
edit- the word only kind of sounds a little bias in the sentence she was only 9 years old maybe just she was 9 years old
- using headers for the different sections instead of just bold text
- could use maybe 1 or 2 more articles
Overall
editgreat job team Regina Gwynn this article is really good great information most things i found were opportunities for the article were visual just breaking up sections with headers instead of bold text and the word only in the sentence listed above great job covering the topic staying natural pulling from resources and organizing the information