User:A.Evanzz/Environmental communication/Bibliography

Bibliography

edit

This is where you will compile the bibliography for your Wikipedia assignment. Add the name and/or notes about what each source covers, then use the "Cite" button to generate the citation for that source.

  • Brulle, Robert J. (2010-03-01). "From Enviornmental Campaigns to Advancing the Public Dialog: Enviornmental Communication for Civic Engagement" Enviornmental Communication. [1]
    • From my first article I think that I will be able to get some information regarding civic engagement. I think that I can also pull some information about the way that climate change is discussed by people and different methods that are being used to disseminate information about climate change. This should be a reliable source because it was published in a peer reviewed journal on the topic of environmental communication.
  • Kotcher, John E.; Myers, Teresa A.; Vraga, Emily K.; Stenhouse, Neil; Maibach, Edward W. (2017-05-04). "Does Engagement in Advocacy Hurt the Credibility of Scientists? Results from a Randomized National Survey Experiment". Enviornmental Communications. [2]
    • This should be a reliable source as it was published in a peer-reviewed journal and is not said to have any conflict of interests or anything of that nature. I think that I will be able to get a lot of good information from this article that can be added to the Wikipedia page for the topic especially in the area regarding limitations of environmental communication.
  • Lakoff, George (2010-03-01). "Why it Matters How We Frame the Environment". Environmental Communication. [3]
    • This should be a reliable source of information on the subject as it was published in a peer-reviewed journal and had no mentioned conflicts of interest. I think that this article can give me a lot general information about the framing of environmental communication as well as the way that it is framed in different sectors of life be they political, scientific, or any other.
  • Christensen, Miyase; Aberg, Anna; Lidstrom, Susanna; Larsen, Katarina (2018-01-02). "Enviornmental Themes in Popular Narratives". Enviornmental [4]
    • This seems as though it should be a reliable source of information as it was published in a peer reviewed journal and had no mentions of conflicting interests. From this article I think that I can pull a lot of really good and interesting information about the different environmental narratives that are circulating, and I think that I can put that information into sections like within academia or create a new section in which these narratives are the main focus and in so doing I can spread more information about the popular narratives surrounding the environment.
  • Wang, Xiaohui; Chen, Liang; Shi, Jingyuan; Tang, Hongjie (2021-04-12). "Who Sets the Agenda? the Dynamic Agenda Setting of the Wildlife Issue on Social Media. Enviornmental Communication.[5]
    • This article seems fairly impartial as it reports no potential conflict of interest however it may have some strange bias as it did receive funding from the Chinese National Funding of Social Sciences. I think that this article will provide a good deal of information that can be added to the Wikipedia page for the topic especially in the section regarding climate change communication subheading or the information technology heading as it really highlights the way that social media along with mass media operates to create narratives surrounding the environment.
  • Bognar, Julia; Skogstad, Grace; Mondou, Matthieu (2020-11-16). "Media Coverage and Public Policy: Reinforcing and Undermining Media Images and Advanced Biofuels Policies in Canada and the United States". Enviornmental Communication.[6]
    • This article seems to be impartial and was published in a peer-reviewed journal however it does state that it received a grant from BioFuelNet Canada Phase II, Project 9B. I think that this article can help to provide information about environmental communication as it occurs around the world because it looks at how it is presented in Canada as compared to the United States. I think that this is something that is important to do because I think that it can flesh out the topic in a way that cannot be done without grounding the conversation in reality.
  • Bayes, Robin; Bolsen, Toby; Druckman, James N. (2023-01-02). "A Research Agenda for Climate Change Communication and Public Opinion: The Role of Scientific Consensus Messaging and Beyond" Enviornmental Communication.[7]
    • This journal seems impartial and was published in a peer reviewed journal with no mention of potential conflicting interests. I think that this article can be used to further flesh out the limitations of environmental communication as it highlights the difficulties associated with communicating the findings regarding the environment and the way that it is changing to the public. I think that this is especially the case because it highlights the role of disagreements within the community and the role that they can play.
  • van Eck, Christel W.; Mulder, Bob C.; van der Linden, Sander (2021-02-17). "Echo Chamber Effects in the Climate Change Blogosphere". Enviornmental Communication.[8]
    • This article seems impartial and was published in a peer reviewed journal with no mention of potential conflicting interests. I think that this article can be used to help further the discussion of the limitations of environmental communication as it can introduce the idea of echo chambers and their prevalence when it comes to how people learn about the environment and gain the feelings regarding the reality of climate change and how they should feel about it.
  • Cloud, Doug (2020-08-17). "The Corrupted Scientist Archetype and Its Implications for Climate Change Communication and Public Perceptions of Science". Enviornmental Communication.[9]
    • This article seems impartial and was posted in a peer reviewed journal, along with this there was no mention of a conflict of interests. I think that this article can be used to help expand the section on the limitations of environmental communication by examining the idea of corrupt scientists and how the spreading of this idea can create more problems when it comes to the public's understanding of the topic as well as who they feel as though they should believe.
  • Munshi, Debashish; Kurian, Priya; Cretney, Raven; Morrison, Sandra L.; Kathlene, Lyn (2020-07-03). "Centering Culture in Public Engagement on Climate Change". Enviornmental Communication.[10]
    • This article seems to be impartial and is posted in a peer reviewed journal, they did not metion any potential conflict of interests. I think that this article has a lot of information that could be added to this Wikipedia article especially with regard to the inclusion of other societies to the discussion as it highlights the need to approach the dissemination of information in a culturally relevant way.

References

edit
  1. ^ Brulle, Robert J. (2010-03-01). "From Environmental Campaigns to Advancing the Public Dialog: Environmental Communication for Civic Engagement". Environmental Communication. 4 (1): 82–98. doi:10.1080/17524030903522397. ISSN 1752-4032.
  2. ^ Kotcher, John E.; Myers, Teresa A.; Vraga, Emily K.; Stenhouse, Neil; Maibach, Edward W. (2017-05-04). "Does Engagement in Advocacy Hurt the Credibility of Scientists? Results from a Randomized National Survey Experiment". Environmental Communication. 11 (3): 415–429. doi:10.1080/17524032.2016.1275736. ISSN 1752-4032.
  3. ^ Lakoff, George (2010-03-01). "Why it Matters How We Frame the Environment". Environmental Communication. 4 (1): 70–81. doi:10.1080/17524030903529749. ISSN 1752-4032.
  4. ^ Christensen, Miyase; Åberg, Anna; Lidström, Susanna; Larsen, Katarina (2018-01-02). "Environmental Themes in Popular Narratives". Environmental Communication. 12 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1080/17524032.2018.1421802. ISSN 1752-4032.
  5. ^ Wang, Xiaohui; Chen, Liang; Shi, Jingyuan; Tang, Hongjie (2021-04-12). "Who Sets the Agenda? the Dynamic Agenda Setting of the Wildlife Issue on Social Media". Environmental Communication. 0 (0): 1–18. doi:10.1080/17524032.2021.1901760. ISSN 1752-4032.
  6. ^ Bognar, Julia; Skogstad, Grace; Mondou, Matthieu (2020-11-16). "Media Coverage and Public Policy: Reinforcing and Undermining Media Images and Advanced Biofuels Policies in Canada and the United States". Environmental Communication. 14 (8): 1127–1144. doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1787479. ISSN 1752-4032.
  7. ^ Bayes, Robin; Bolsen, Toby; Druckman, James N. (2023-01-02). "A Research Agenda for Climate Change Communication and Public Opinion: The Role of Scientific Consensus Messaging and Beyond". Environmental Communication. 17 (1): 16–34. doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1805343. ISSN 1752-4032.
  8. ^ van Eck, Christel W.; Mulder, Bob C.; van der Linden, Sander (2021-02-17). "Echo Chamber Effects in the Climate Change Blogosphere". Environmental Communication. 15 (2): 145–152. doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1861048. ISSN 1752-4032.
  9. ^ Cloud, Doug (2020-08-17). "The Corrupted Scientist Archetype and Its Implications for Climate Change Communication and Public Perceptions of Science". Environmental Communication. 14 (6): 816–829. doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1741420. ISSN 1752-4032.
  10. ^ Munshi, Debashish; Kurian, Priya; Cretney, Raven; Morrison, Sandra L.; Kathlene, Lyn (2020-07-03). "Centering Culture in Public Engagement on Climate Change". Environmental Communication. 14 (5): 573–581. doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1746680. ISSN 1752-4032.