United States v. Davila, 569 U.S. 597 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when a federal judge participates in the plea process in violation of rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a guilty plea need not be vacated if the record shows prejudice to the decision to plea due to rule 11(h).[1]
| United States v. Davila | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued April 15, 2013 Decided June 13, 2013 | |
| Full case name | United States, Petitioner v. Anthony Davila |
| Docket no. | 12-167 |
| Citations | 569 U.S. 597 (more) 133 S. Ct. 2139; 186 L. Ed. 2d 139; 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4541; 81 U.S.L.W. 4394 |
| Argument | Oral argument |
| Case history | |
| Prior | 664 F.3d 1355 (11th Cir. 2011) |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Ginsburg, joined by Roberts, Kennedy, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan |
| Concurrence | Scalia, joined by Thomas |
Notes edit
References edit
- United States v. Davila, 569 U.S. 597 (2013).
- Supreme Court of the United States (August 2012). "Docket for United States v. Davila".
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - United States Department of Justice (December 2012). "Reply Brief for United States v. Davila" (PDF).
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - American Bar Association (March 2013). "Amicus Brief for United States v. Davila" (PDF).
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - United States v. Davila, 664 F.3d 1355 (11th Cir. 2011).
External links edit
- Text of United States v. Davila, 569 U.S. 597 (2013) is available from: CourtListener Google Scholar Justia Oyez (oral argument audio)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |