In economics, the throw away paradox is a situation in which a person can gain by throwing away some of his property. It was first described[citation needed] by Robert J. Aumann and B. Peleg[1] as a note on a similar paradox by David Gale.[2]
Description edit
There is an economy with two commodities (x and y) and two traders (e.g. Alice and Bob).
- In one situation, the initial endowments are (20,0) and (0,10), i.e, Alice has twenty units of commodity x and Bob has ten units of commodity y. Then, the market opens for trade. In equilibrium, Alice's bundle is (4,2), i.e, she has four units of x and two units of y.
- In the second situation, Alice decides to discard half of her initial endowment - she throws away 10 units of commodity x. Then, the market opens for trade. In equilibrium, Alice's bundle is (5,5) - she has more of every commodity than in the first situation.
Details edit
The paradox happens in the following situation. Both traders have the same utility function with the following characteristics:
- It is a homothetic utility function.
- The slope of the indifference curves at is -1.
- The slope of the indifference curves at is -1/8.
One such function is , where is a certain parameter between 0 and 1, but many other such functions exist.
The explanation for the paradox is that when the quantity of x decreases, its price increases, and the increase in price is more than sufficient to compensate Alice for the decrease in quantity.
See also edit
References edit
- ^ Aumann, R.J.; Peleg, B. (1974). "A note on Gale's example". Journal of Mathematical Economics. 1 (2): 209. doi:10.1016/0304-4068(74)90012-3.
- ^ Gale, David (1974). "Exchange equilibrium and coalitions". Journal of Mathematical Economics. 1: 63–66. doi:10.1016/0304-4068(74)90036-6.