The purpose of a system is what it does
Origins of the termEdit
- "According to the cybernetician, the purpose of a system is what it does. This is a basic dictum. It stands for bald fact, which makes a better starting point in seeking understanding than the familiar attributions of good intention, prejudices about expectations, moral judgment, or sheer ignorance of circumstances."
The term is widely used by systems theorists. It is generally invoked to counter the notion that the purpose of a system can be read from the intentions of those who design, operate, or promote it. From a cybernetic perspective complex systems are not controllable by simple notions of management, and interventions in a system can best be understood by looking at how they affect observed system behavior. When "side effects" or "unintended consequences" reveal that system behavior is poorly understood, then taking the POSIWID perspective allows the more political understandings of system behavior to be balanced by a more straightforwardly descriptive view.
The term is used in many fields including biology and management. Whereas a cybernetician may apply the principle to the results inexorably produced by the mechanical dynamics of an activity system, a management scientist may apply it to the results produced by the self-interest of actors who play roles in a business or other institution.
- Beer, Stafford (2002-01-01). "What is cybernetics?". Kybernetes. 31 (2): 209–219. doi:10.1108/03684920210417283. ISSN 0368-492X.
- Systems biology : philosophical foundations. Fred C. Boogerd (1st ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier. 2007. ISBN 978-0-444-52085-2. OCLC 162587033.CS1 maint: others (link)
- Ward, Aidan (2003). Trust and mistrust : radical risk strategies in business relationships. John Smith. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley. ISBN 0-470-85318-2. OCLC 51966365.