The Undivine Comedy

The Undivine Comedy or The Un-divine Comedy (Polish: Nie Boska komedia or Nie-boska komedia),[a] is a play written by Polish Romantic poet Zygmunt Krasiński in 1833, published anonymously in 1835.[7] Its main theme is sociopolitical conflict – in Krasiński's words, "[between] aristocracy and democracy". It is Krasiński's best-known work[8][7][9] and is regarded as one of the most important works of Polish Romantic literature.[10][11][12]

The Undivine Comedy, 1835 edition
The Undivine Comedy, 1837 edition
The Undivine Comedy, 1923 edition

HistoryEdit

Krasiński began work on The Undivine Comedy in June 1833 in Vienna, and finished it in autumn the following year in Venice.[8] It was published in Paris in 1835 anonymously,[8] likely to protect the author's family from any repercussions in the Russian Empire, of which they were subjects. Krasiński's writings often contained thinly veiled references to current politics.[13][7]

Krasiński would later work on another drama related to The Undivine Comedy. He considered composing a trilogy, of which the Undivine Comedy would likely have been the middle part, but he never finished the project (the draft of the first part would eventually be published in 1852 as Sen. Pieśń z „Niedokończonego poematu”, wyjęta z pozostałych rękopisów po świętej pamięci J. S., and more extensively, posthumously as Niedokończony poemat – The Unfinished Poem in 1860).[14][8][15][16] The entire trilogy was to have featured the same protagonist, Count Henry, called "The Youth" in the unfinished prequel, and "The Husband" in The Undivine Comedy.[15]

The play has been translated into more than a dozen languages.[17] Within a few years it received a French translation by Władysław Mickiewicz [pl].[3] Based on the French translation, in 1868 Robert Lytton published a drama titled Orval, or the Fool of Time which has been inspired by Krasiński's work to the point it has been discussed in scholarly literature as an example of a "rough translation",[18] paraphrase[19] or even plagiarism.[3]The Undivine Comedy was first translated to English in 1864 by Marthy Walker Cook (although she based it on earlier French and German translations),[3][19] again in 1924 (by Harriette E. Kennedy and Zofia Umińska, with a preface by G. K. Chesterton), for the third time in 1977 (By Harold B. Segel) and most recently in 1999 (by Charles S. Kraszewski).[20][6]

Initially it was considered too difficult to be adopted properly into a theatre,[7][21] and it was never staged during Krasiński's liftetime.[10] It was finally put on the stage in 1902 in the Juliusz Słowacki Theatre in Kraków by Józef Kotarbiński [pl][10][22] and since that time it has been staged numerous times in Poland and abroad.[17] Gordon M. Wickstrom, writing in 1972, noted that "since World War II nearly all leading Polish directors have undertaken" directing the play, also noting that while it has been produced in a number of other European countries, it has remained "unproduced and nearly unknown in English".[10] In 1988 Michael Finnissy directed an operatic version of it, shown in Paris and London.[21] In Poland, it has been directed by among others Arnold Szyfman (Warsaw 1920), Leon Schiller (Warsaw 1926, Łódź 1938), Bohdan Korzeniewski [pl] (Warsaw 1959), Konrad Swinarski [pl] (Kraków 1965), Adam Hanuszkiewicz (Warsaw 1969) and Jerzy Grzegorzewski [pl] (Warsaw 2002) to the music of composers such as Ludomir Różycki, Jan Maklakiewicz, Grażyna Bacewicz and Krzysztof Penderecki staged the play from the 1920s onward.[17]

It has been a part of secondary-education curriculum in Poland since at least 1923.[23][24][25]

PlotEdit

The plot of the drama takes place in the near future, where Krasiński used recent contemporary events, such as the French Revolution, and the ensuing power struggle between the Jacobins and other factions as inspiration and extrapolating a number of social trends, describing a fictional pan-European revolution against the Christian aristocracy.[8][7][17][10] The protagonist of the drama, Count Henry (in Polish, Henryk), is a conflicted poet, who finds himself leading, together with his fellow aristocrats, a defense of the Holy Trinity castle,[b] against revolutionary forces professing democratic and atheist ideals, commanded by a leader named Pancras (in Polish, Pankracy). In the end, both sides are portrayed as a failure: while the revolutionaries take the castle, their leader increasingly doubts the righteous of their cause, and the drama ends with him seeing the vision of the Christianity being triumphant after all.[7][17][10]

The play is divided into four parts and thirty-two scenes.[10] The first two parts of the work build up the character of Count Henry, focusing on his private life as a husband, father, and artist; while the next two are focused on large revolutionary struggle.[7]

AnalysisEdit

The initial title of the drama was Mąż (The Husband).[28] Another title that Krasiński considered was Ludzka Komedia (The Human Comedy).[29][30][c] That title as well as the final title of the drama that Krasiński settled on were both inspired by Dante's Divine Comedy and have a double meaning: it depicts history as a work of humanity, or as a comedy taking place in absence of divine intervention, but contrary to God's will.[31][29] The work has been influenced by Krasiński's thoughts about the Polish November Uprising and the contemporary French July Revolution of 1830, coupled with his study of the changes wrought by the emerging capitalism to Western Europe.[8][7]

Krasiński's work effectively discussed the concept of class struggle before Karl Marx coined the term.[7][32][9] It has been described as the "first literary expression of class war"[13] and a "queer prefiguring of Marx".[33] The philosophy of the revolutionaries in the drama has been described as "nothing other than dialectical materialism".[7] The drama's themes are social revolution and the destruction of the noble class. It is critical both of the weak and cowardly aristocracy, whose destruction it prophesized, but also of the revolution, which he portrayed as a destructive force. The work is also tackling the topics of the identity of a poet, the nature of poetry, and myths of romantic ideals such as perfect love, fame and happiness.[8]

Count Henry has been analyzed as an example of the "worst possible version of Romantic individualism", conceited and egoistical, only partially redeemed by his service to humankind, a task in which he will ultimately fail in as well.[17][10] Professing to defend the Christian ideals, he ultimately commits the sin of suicide.[7] He has also been described as influenced by Goethe's Faust.[11]

Halina Floryńska-Lalewicz summarized the message of the work as follows: "Krasiński seems to say that in historical reality neither side can be fully in the right. Righteousness resides solely in the divine dimension, and it can be brought into the world by none other than Providence and the forces aligned with it. Man caught up in history is always a tragic figure, condemned to be imperfect and make the wrong choices."[17]

One aspect of the Undivine Comedy that has attracted criticism is its presentation of Jews as conspirators against the Christian world order.[25][34][15] Published in 1835, it was one of the first works - perhaps the first - in a string of modern antisemitic literature leading to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.[34][15] Maria Janion thus termed it a "tainted masterpiece".[25] According to Agata Adamiecka-Sitek, this poses a significant problem today, as the work "is both canonical and profoundly embarrassing for Polish culture, on par perhaps with The Merchant of Venice in the western theatre canon."[25] The controversial nature of the material led to the cancellation of a recent stage production by director Oliver Frljić [pl], that was due to open in 2014 in Warsaw.[25][35]

ReceptionEdit

 
The Undivine Comedy, performance in Teatr Nowy Łodź, 1959

19th-century romantic poet Adam Mickiewicz discussed the work in four of his lectures given at the Collège de France, calling it "the highest achievement of the Slavic theater",[7] as well as a "thoroughly nationalistic... [touching on] all the problems of Polish messianism."[36] He criticized Krasiński for his depictions of the "Israelites" – Jews – which he characterized as a "national offense".[36]Monica Mary Gardner in 1915 in her biography of Krasiński described the work as "the masterpiece of matured genius".[37] Over a century after the play was first published, Wacław Lednicki [pl] writing in 1959 for The Polish Review called it a "masterpiece of Polish drama".[38] Shortly afterward, Polish writer and Nobel Prize in Literature laureate Czesław Miłosz in his 1969 book The History of Polish Literature called this work "truly pioneering" and "undoubtedly a masterpiece not only of Polish but also of world literature". Miłosz notes that it is uprising such a brilliant work was created by an author who was barely out of his teens.[7] Gordon M. Wickstrom in 1972 writing for the Educational Theatre Journal called it "the finest achievement of Polish Romantic drama".[10] Robert Mann in 1983 in the Slavic and East European Journal noted that it "ranks alongside Mickiewicz's Forefather's Eve and Słowacki's Kordian as one of the greatest dramatic works in Polish Romantic literature.[11] In 1986 Frank Northen Magill in the Critical Survey of Drama: Authors wrote that "The Undivine Comedy... suffices to ensure Krasiński's position as a dramatist of international stature".[39] Writing for the same journal as Mann in 1997, Megan L. Dixon described the work as "a classic of 19th-century High Romanticism... worthy of comparison to Goethe or Byron".[40] Gerard T. Kapolka in 2000 in The Polish Review referred to it as a "great play".[6] Halina Floryńska-Lalewicz, in her biography of Krasiński (published in 2004 at Culture.pl), calls it an outstanding example of Romantic metaphysical drama.[17] Harold B. Segel, in Polish Romantic Drama: Three Plays in English Translation (2014), remarks that "the play has steadily gained prestige in the twentieth century and is widely regarded in contemporary Poland as one of the greatest dramatic works to emerge from the Romantic period."[12]

NotesEdit

  1. ^ The title has also been rendered in English as The Non-Divine Comedy,[1] The Ungodly Comedy,[2] The Infernal Comedy,[3][4] and The Unholy Comedy.[5] Gerard T. Kapolka suggested that a better title conveying Krasiński's intent might be The Godless Comedy,[6] while Mary Lowell Putnam proposed The Profane Comedy.[3]
  2. ^ A real castle (Okopy Świętej Trójcy [pl]), located in the Okopy, Ternopil Oblast.[26][27]
  3. ^ This title, likely mentioned to Honoré de Balzac by their mutual friend Henry Reeve, may have inspired the French author to give that title to his own La Comédie humaine.[30]

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ Filipczak, Dorota (1994). "Theology in Asylum. The Failure of Salvific Story in Malcolm Lowry's "Lunar Caustic"". Literature and Theology. 8 (4): 394–404. doi:10.1093/litthe/8.4.394. ISSN 0269-1205. JSTOR 23924705.
  2. ^ Deborah Holmes; Lisa Silverman (2009). Interwar Vienna: Culture Between Tradition and Modernity. Camden House. p. 44. ISBN 978-1-57113-420-2.
  3. ^ a b c d e Budrewicz, Aleksandra (2014). "Przekład, parafraza czy plagiat? "Nie-Boska komedia" Zygmunta Krasińskiego po angielsku". Wiek XIX. Rocznik Towarzystwa Literackiego Im. Adama Mickiewicza (in Polish). XLIX (1): 23–44. ISSN 2080-0851.
  4. ^ Wacław Lednicki (1964). Zygmunt Krasiński, Romantic Universalist. Polish Institute of Arts and Sciences in America. p. 180.
  5. ^ Artur Sandauer (1 June 2005). On the situation of the Polish writer of Jewish descent in the twentieth century: it is not I who should have written this study--. Hebrew University, Magnes Press. p. 18. ISBN 9789654932103.
  6. ^ a b c Kapolka, Gerard T. (2000). "Review of The Undivine Comedy, Zygmunt Krasiński". The Polish Review. 45 (2): 239–241. ISSN 0032-2970. JSTOR 25779189.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Czeslaw Milosz (24 October 1983). The History of Polish Literature, Updated Edition. University of California Press. pp. 245 and 246. ISBN 978-0-520-04477-7.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g Sudolski, Zbigniew (2016). "Zygmunt Krasiński". Internetowy Polski Słownik Biograficzny (in Polish). Archived from the original on 12 August 2019.
  9. ^ a b Christopher John Murray (13 May 2013). Encyclopedia of the Romantic Era, 1760–1850. Routledge. p. 626. ISBN 978-1-135-45579-8.
  10. ^ a b c d e f g h i Wickstrom, Gordon M. (1972). ""The Un-Divine Comedy": Drama of Art and Revolution". Educational Theatre Journal. 24 (3): 269–282. doi:10.2307/3205896. ISSN 0013-1989. JSTOR 3205896.
  11. ^ a b c Mann, Robert (1983). "Krasiński's Undivine Comedy and Goethe's Faust". The Slavic and East European Journal. 27 (3): 354–364. doi:10.2307/307862. ISSN 0037-6752. JSTOR 307862.
  12. ^ a b Segel, Harold B. (8 April 2014). Polish Romantic Drama: Three Plays in English Translation. Routledge. p. 26. ISBN 978-1-134-40042-3.
  13. ^ a b "Zygmunt Krasiński | Polish poet and dramatist". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 26 May 2020.
  14. ^ Twórczość. Związek Literatów Polskich. RSW "Prasa-Książa-Ruch". 1960. p. 93.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  15. ^ a b c d Fiećko, Jerzy (27 November 2014). "Co zrobić z Niedokończonym poematem Zygmunta Krasińskiego?". Sztuka Edycji (in Polish). 6: 23–28. doi:10.12775/SE.2014.004. ISSN 2391-7903.
  16. ^ Victor Erlich (1964). The double image: concepts of the poet in Slavic literatures. Johns Hopkins Press. p. 53. ISBN 9780598223975.
  17. ^ a b c d e f g h Floryńska-Lalewicz, Halina (2004). "Zygmunt Krasiński". Culture.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 25 May 2020.
  18. ^ Monica M. Gardner (29 January 2015). The Anonymous Poet of Poland. Cambridge University Press. p. 134. ISBN 978-1-107-46104-8.
  19. ^ a b O. Classe, ed. (2000). Encyclopedia of Literary Translation Into English: A-L. Taylor & Francis. p. 775. ISBN 978-1-884964-36-7.
  20. ^ Thompson, Ewa (1 November 2001). "On Zygmunt Krasinski's Undivine Comedy". The Chesterton Review. Retrieved 30 May 2020.
  21. ^ a b Clements, Andrew (1988). "Finnissy's Undivine Comedy". The Musical Times. 129 (1745): 330–332. doi:10.2307/964740. ISSN 0027-4666. JSTOR 964740.
  22. ^ Małgorzata Sokalska (1 September 2012). Wokół Krasińskiego (in Polish). Wydawnictwo UJ. p. 137. ISBN 978-83-233-8753-4.
  23. ^ Świdziński, J., ed. (2003). Wydalony z Parnasu: księga pośwęcona pamięci Zygmunta Krasińskiego (in Polish). Wydawn. Poznańskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Nauk. p. 26. ISBN 978-83-7063-373-8.
  24. ^ Starnawski, Jerzy (2003). Od zarania dziejów literatury polskiej po wiek XX (in Polish). Wydawn. Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. p. 201. ISBN 978-83-7171-629-4.
  25. ^ a b c d e Adamiecka-Sitek, Agata (2016). "Poles, Jews and Aesthetic Experience: On the Cancelled Theatre Production by Olivier Frljić". Polish Theatre Journal. 1.
  26. ^ Franciszek Wiktor Mleczko (1963). Wieś rodzinna wzywa. Ludowa Spółdzielnia Wydawnicza. p. 53.
  27. ^ Katarzyna Węglicka (2006). Wędrówki kresowe: gawędy o miejscach, ludziach i zdarzeniach. Książka i Wiedza. p. 165. ISBN 978-83-05-13450-7.
  28. ^ Zbigniew Sudolski (1997). Krasiński: opowieść biograficzna. Wydawn. Ancher. p. 149. ISBN 978-83-85576-19-8.
  29. ^ a b Bėlza, Igor (1974). Portrety romantyków. Original from - Pennsylvania State University: Pax. p. 173.
  30. ^ a b Folkierski, Władysław; Maguire, Robert A. (1960). "The History of Two Titles: The Undivine Comedy and the Comedie Humaine". The Polish Review. 5 (1): 103–108. ISSN 0032-2970. JSTOR 25776296.
  31. ^ Kuciak, Agnieszka (2003). Dante Romantyków: Recepcja Boskiej Komedii u Mickiewicza, Słowackiego, Krasińskiego i Norwida (in Polish). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM. p. 31. ISBN 978-83-232-1240-9.
  32. ^ Czeslaw Milosz (21 August 1981). Emperor of the Earth: Modes of Eccentric Vision. University of California Press. p. 57. ISBN 978-0-520-04503-3.
  33. ^ Anne Applebaum (13 June 2017). Between East and West: Across the Borderlands of Europe. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. p. 288. ISBN 978-0-525-43319-4.
  34. ^ a b Bronner, Stepehn Eric (2019). A Rumor about the Jews: Conspiracy, Anti-Semitism, and the Protocols of Zion (Second ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Palgrave macmillan. p. 67. ISBN 978-3-319-95395-3.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  35. ^ Mrozek, Witold (20 January 2014). "Niedoszła "Nie-Boska", czyli co zdjął Klata". wyborcza.pl (in Polish). Retrieved 27 May 2020.
  36. ^ a b Duker, Abraham G. (1962). "The Mystery of the Jews in Mickiewicz's Towianist Lectures on Slav Literature". The Polish Review: 40–66.
  37. ^ Monica M. Gardner (29 January 2015). The Anonymous Poet of Poland. Cambridge University Press. p. 90. ISBN 978-1-107-46104-8.
  38. ^ Lednicki, Wacław (1959). "The Undivine Comedy". The Polish Review. 4 (3): 106–135. ISSN 0032-2970. JSTOR 25776261.
  39. ^ Frank Northen Magill (1986). Critical Survey of Drama: Authors. Salem Press. p. 1095. ISBN 978-0-89356-385-1.
  40. ^ Dixon, Megan L. (1997). "Maria beyond Marriage in Zygmunt Krasiński's Nie-Boska komedia". The Slavic and East European Journal. 41 (3): 442–457. doi:10.2307/310186. ISSN 0037-6752. JSTOR 310186.

External linksEdit