 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | This template was considered for deletion on 2020 November 9. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". |
How do you provide the argument to this template? Denni ☯ 21:38, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
- I whacked the template after creating it, seeing as no purpose, but I guess people wanted it. So if it gets deleted again, I will not complain. Zach (Smack Back) 22:22, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
See "22:33, 29 December 2005 Zscout370 deleted "Template:Userbox/FA" (content was: '
{| cellspacing="0" style="width: 238px; background: #F0DC82;"| style="width: 45px; ...' (and the only contributor was 'Zscout370'))" Zach (Smack Back) 22:23, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
This user wrote
edit"This user wrote"? All by themselves, with no input from others? How unusual. Reeks of OWNership. pfctdayelise 16:21, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- Occasionally, people do write articles by themselves, nominate them, and get them featured, so why not? —Nightstallion (?) 20:45, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- I find it extremely hard to believe that an article could go through Peer review and FAC without attracting even a single edit from another user. pfctdayelise 03:21, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Noone ever said anything about the user being the only contributor. shrugs —Nightstallion (?) 10:50, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- How about this user has significantly contributed to...? AndyZ t 22:15, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Merge?
editThis userbox appears to be redundant with Template:User Featured articles. Any reason we shouldn't redirect this one to there? rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 18:15, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Alignment
editHow to align it to right? I tried 'info-a' but no success. Why? Farvardyn (talk) 17:59, 5 May 2020 (UTC)