Template talk:Tourist attractions in New York City

Latest comment: 15 years ago by The Duke of Waltham in topic Basis for list

Basis for list

edit

Are the attractions in the nav box based on visitor data or is it just an indiscriminate collection of information? Wl219 02:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, didn't notice this comment. There are so many lists, I tried to take the ones common to
The top 5 are Times Square (#1 worldwide at 35M), Met (#30 at 4.5 M), Statue of Liberty (#36 at 4.24M), AMNH (#40 at 4m) and the ESB (#42 at 4M).[1] [2]
nyc.com (esb, sol, ellis island, met, moma, central park, times sq, amnh, guggenheim) [3]
gonyc.about.com lists a similiar set (esb, sol, gct, rockcenter, ellis, si ferry, amnh, central park, met, moma)[4]
nyu lists (amnh, met, moma, central park, esb, sol, ellis, si ferry, gct, rock center)[5]
nyctourist.com (esb, top of rock, central park, un, met, fao schwarz, ground zero, S of L, Rock Center, Times Square, AMNH, Intrepid, Seaport)[6]
Summarizing this (and rounding Ellis Island into S o L and "Top of the Rock" into Rock Center, you get (ranked by mentions)
1-3 ESB, Statue of Liberty, AMNH
4-5 Central Park, Met
6-8 Moma, Rock Center, Times Square
9-11 UN, GCT, SI Ferry
12-16 Brooklyn Bridge, Guggenheim, FAO schwartz, Ground Zero, Intrepid, Seaport
dm 03:53, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Reply
PS, many of the official web sites for attractions list "millions" or "thousands a day" and nothing more specific. The forbes list specifically mentions that there were many attractions which did not publish numbers and thus could not be counted. dm 03:55, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I would take MSNBC/Forbes as a reliable source and use that list. All the other lists you mention don't say that they're based on hard data on visitor numbers. Wl219 07:15, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

It appears Central Park gets about 20M visitors a yearnycgovparks.org, which would put it at #2 dm 23:34, 10 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

The MoMA had 2.67M visitors in the first year after reopening Economic Impact, which puts it last in Forbes list, but I still think close enough to add to the list dm 23:45, 10 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Let's make these links a bit more obvious... Waltham, The Duke of 00:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)Reply