This template is supported by the Department of Fun, which aims to provide Wikipedians with fun so that they stay on Wikipedia and keep on improving articles. If you have any ideas, do not hesitate to post them to the discussion page or access our home page to join the Department of Fun.Department of FunWikipedia:Department of FunTemplate:WikiProject Department of FunDepartment of Fun articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I had to remove this code: {{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#ifeq:{{{sig}}}|n| |-- ~~<includeonly></includeonly>~~}} because the template always displayed with an added {{subst:#ifeq:n|n| |-- ~~~~}}. — Sebastian 00:59, 2 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
That would be because you didn't subst: the template, you transcluded it instead. As written before your change, it worked when subst'd. Now it won't -- and any change to it will affect every page where it's transcluded, making them vulnerable to template vandalism. I wish you had copied the template over to a new one for the purpose of non-subst use, and left this one as is. Ben 06:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
Sorry about that - I just reverted the coda to your version, so it should work again. But is there really no way to make it work in both modes? It doesn't make sense to create a template for non-subst, because you never know when it gets subst'd by a bot, or even by a user when they archives it. — Sebastian 09:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
But is there really no way to make it work in both modes? It doesn't make sense to create a template for non-subst, because you never know when it gets subst'd by a bot, or even by a user when they archives it. — Sebastian 09:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)