Template talk:Infobox electronic component

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Anonimski in topic Symbol caption
WikiProject iconInfoboxes
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
WikiProject iconElectronics Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the template attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk page
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Symbol caption edit

I suggest that we add a field directly below the symbol image, so that we can easily add an explanation if something is unclear. For example, when updating the symbol area so that it would include both the US and IEC standards, I had to resort to this bulky way of adding a caption:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Resistor&oldid=592813207

{{Infobox electronic component
 | component         = Resistor
 | image             = [[File:Resistor.jpg|200px]]
 | caption           = A typical axial-lead resistor
 |type= [[Passivity (engineering)|Passive]]
 |working_principle= [[Electric resistance]]
 |invented=
 |first_produced= 
 |symbol= [[File:Resistors.svg]]
 ''1. US standard <br>2. IEC standard ''
}}

It would be better if there was a designated field for this, because resistor symbols aren't the only things with competing standards. Anonimski (talk) 16:36, 28 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Anonimski: I will add a |symbol_caption= field. Frietjes (talk) 16:51, 31 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. Are you also going to update the Resistor article, or should I update the edit I did earlier? Anonimski (talk) 16:58, 31 January 2014 (UTC)Reply