This template is within the scope of WikiProject Infoboxes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Infoboxes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InfoboxesWikipedia:WikiProject InfoboxesTemplate:WikiProject InfoboxesInfoboxes articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I think there's a fundamental problem with having the "connects to" line in many instances of this infobox. Many of the instances where this has been used either cause misleading or incorrect text. For example, saying that RAM connects to a motherboard via a socket is only true some of the time. Quite often, RAM modules are reflow-soldered directly to a board, and what's more, the notion of a motherboard doesn't necessarily apply to all computers. Similar scenarios exist for the video card and network card instances, which provide a very PC-centric view of the devices and ignore the fact that their functions can either be integrated entirely or almost entirely onto one large board, or even one IC package. Please be careful not to use this infobox in such a way that provides an overly PC-centric view. Computers are implemented in many more ways than a desktop PC. -- mattb@ 2006-10-11T18:01Z
You make a very good point. Sadly this can not be governed by the infobox itself, they havent developed ParserFunctions to be that good (yet...) I will alter the small note at the bottom of the box to recognise the fact that these are only common configurations --TheJosh 07:57, 13 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
We do not need the "200px" on the [[Image:{{{image}}}|200px]]. Does that sound right? We should use "thumbnail" instead to make the thumbnail use the user-preferences size. Example: [[Image:{{{image}}}|thumbnail]]. I'll go ahead and make the change if nobody cares. ~a (user • talk • contribs) 19:44, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
The 200px makes the image always be small enough to fit in the box. If the user has their thumbnail size set to 350px, then the box will blow out and become quite huge. --TheJosh (talk) 23:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There is no guidance as to the meaning of the parameter "Introduced." IMO in should mean "introduced to the public" which could be announcement or first production shipment which ever came first but it could mean beta shipment or general availability or some combination of these. A recent dispute with @Trymkb: highlights the problem and resulted in the parameter not being included. I propose adding guidance here as a change to the Parameter table in the form of:
introduced
Earliest of public announcement date or first production shipment date expressed in {{Start date and age|YYYY|MM|DD|df=yes/no}}
_-_The_Noun_Project.svg){kind=small}
