Template talk:Did you know/Siege of Jerusalem (63 BCE)

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Daniel Case

Siege of Jerusalem (63 BCE)

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle

 

Created/expanded by Poliocretes (talk). Self nom at 12:26, 29 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Please add a comment and signature (or just a signature if endorsing) after each aspect you have reviewed:
Hook

I also clarified that the picture was not painted as the events were unfolding. Daniel Case (talk) 19:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • ALT hooks, if proposed:

Article

Comments/discussion:

  • In the hook paragraph's lede sentence, we should probably reword to avoid the "however" (It used to be on the words to avoid list; while I am more tolerant of its use in intros or things like DYK hooks it should, I think, still be avoided in body text). If Pompey's entry alone desecrated the Holy of Holies, it matters nought that he touched nothing in it (although that fact is worthy of note as well). Daniel Case (talk) 19:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
  OK now. Daniel Case (talk) 18:20, 2 August 2011 (UTC)Reply