Template talk:2008–09 Big 12 Conference women's basketball standings

This template is within the scope of WikiProject College Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College BasketballWikipedia:WikiProject College BasketballTemplate:WikiProject College Basketballcollege basketball articles

Women's sport

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles

Requested move

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR (talk) 22:58, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Template:2008-09 Big 12 women's basketball standings → Template:2008–09 Big 12 women's basketball standings — Templates subdelegated by the standings table don't allow a difference between the template's page (linked in the v-d-e portion to viewing the template and editing the redirect page) and the table title; to comply with WP:MoS, em-dashes are used rather than hyphens in year ranges, such as in the title. The template, previously at the requested page, was moved by an established editor for an unsummarized reason. — CB...(ö) 01:41, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Support. I don't think this survey is necessary as the change is minor - go ahead and move the page. BlueAg09 (Talk) 20:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Discussion

Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic