- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 13:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Zhang Peigang
- ... that Chinese economist Zhang Peigang's dissertation was translated into Spanish and used as a university textbook in Latin America in the 1950s, but it was not published in Chinese until 1984? Source: Ideas in the History of Economic Development
- Reviewed: William Chapple (surveyor)
Created by Lainey H. Liu (talk) and Zanhe (talk). Nominated by Zanhe (talk) at 04:55, 19 November 2019 (UTC).
Hi Zanhe, review follows: article created 17 November; article exceeds minimum length; article is cited inline throughout to what look to be reliable sources; the sources are not accessible to me so I can't make an assessment on any copyright violations (the news articles are in Chinese, the Journal of Asian Economics article is paywalled and I couldn't access the page for the Google Books reference); hook is interesting, mentioned in the article and cited; I couldn't access the hook source page so AGF on that; QPQ has been carried out. Looks good to me.
- I did find it interesting that he died the day he was due to collect a lifetime achievement award. I wonder if a hook could be made from it:
- ALT1: "... that Chinese economist Zhang Peigang died on the day he was due to receive a lifetime achievement award from the Huazhong University of Science and Technology?"
- But it would need checking by a third party, if you wanted to go with it - Dumelow (talk) 16:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Dumelow: Google Books works in mysterious ways! I've tweaked the link above a bit (mainly changing Google.ca to Google.com), are you able to read it now? Thanks for your review and for proposing the new hook. I'm happy with ALT1 as well, the only drawback being that it'll require another review. -Zanhe (talk) 21:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
