Template:Did you know nominations/Wyethia amplexicaulis

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 01:43, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Wyethia amplexicaulis

(

)

Field of Wyethia amplexicaulis in bloom

... that the scenic fields of northern wyethia found in the western United States are sometimes a sign that an area has been overgrazed? Source: ^[1]^[2]
- ALT1: ... that though northern mule ears is a modest sized wildflower its taproot can reach 1.8 meters (6 feet) into the ground? Source: ^[3]
- ALT2: ... that the scenic fields of northern mule ears found in the western United States are sometimes a sign that an area has been overgrazed? Source: ^[1]^[2]
- Reviewed:

Created by MtBotany (talk). Self-nominated at 18:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Wyethia amplexicaulis; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

I will review this within a day. Cessaune [talk] 02:50, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: Everything is good, but I don't think that the addition of both the generic and scientific name is neccessary, and it creates unnecessary clutter/adds length. The same thing could be accomplished by simply dropping the scientific name entirely. Also, I would only recommend that the image be used if the main nom goes through and not ALT1. Cessaune [talk] 02:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

@MtBotany: Please address Cessaune's review above. Z1720 (talk) 16:55, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

@Cessaune: Changed to put in just the common name, but used the common name "northern weythia" for the main hook. Put in "northern mule ears" as ALT2. Which of the three do you think is most catchy? Thanks for the ping Z1720, I had let this one slide when I went on vacation. I had an amazing time (four weeks in Berlin), but some projects did rather slip through my hands. Thanks for patience and help from everyone. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 17:22, 21 October 2023 (UTC)

I like the main one. Cessaune [talk] 15:39, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

@Cessaune: Are you ready to approve this? If so, please add the green tick. If not, please list your concerns below. Z1720 (talk) 19:02, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Cessaune [talk] 21:24, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

References

^ ^a ^b Jankovsky-Jones, Mabel.; Jankovsky-Jones, Mabel; Murphy, Chris; Coulter, Cyndi; Moseley, Robert K. (2001). Riparian and Wetland Plant Associations of Southwestern Idaho : With a Focus on the Bureau of Land Management's Lower Snake River District. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Science and Technology Center, Information and Communications Group. pp. 167–168. Retrieved 23 August 2023.
^ ^a ^b Mueggler, W. F.; Campbell, Robert B. (1982). Aspen Community Types on the Caribou and Targhee National Forests in Southeastern Idaho. Ogden, Utah: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. pp. 18–19.
^ Weaver, John Ernest (1917). A Study of the Vegetation of Southeastern Washington and Adjacent Idaho. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska. pp. 106–107. Retrieved 23 August 2023.

[Riparian-1] Jankovsky-Jones, Mabel.; Jankovsky-Jones, Mabel; Murphy, Chris; Coulter, Cyndi; Moseley, Robert K. (2001). Riparian and Wetland Plant Associations of Southwestern Idaho : With a Focus on the Bureau of Land Management's Lower Snake River District. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Science and Technology Center, Information and Communications Group. pp. 167–168. Retrieved 23 August 2023.

[AspenIdaho-2] Mueggler, W. F.; Campbell, Robert B. (1982). Aspen Community Types on the Caribou and Targhee National Forests in Southeastern Idaho. Ogden, Utah: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. pp. 18–19.

[Weaver-3] Weaver, John Ernest (1917). A Study of the Vegetation of Southeastern Washington and Adjacent Idaho. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska. pp. 106–107. Retrieved 23 August 2023.

[1]

[2]

[3]