- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 01:06, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Working from Within: The Nature and Development of Quine's Naturalism
- ... that the book Working from Within illustrates how W. V. Quine's philosophical thought challenges popular conceptions of philosophy? Source: "One of the many valuable philosophical contributions of the book is to explain in detail ... how Quine's naturalism systematically challenges the idea, still popular among some analytic philosophers today, that philosophy is an a priori discipline"[1]
- ALT1: ... that the book Working from Within details how W. V. Quine only began to use the term "naturalism" years after he had already developed the key tenets of the philosophy? Source: "The final chapter of part two deals with Quine’s evolving views ... The basic elements were already in place in the early 1950s ... Being dissatisfied by the reception of Word and Object and the misunderstanding of his philosophical position led Quine in 1968 to adopt the label "Naturalism" for his philosophy."[2] "One of the many valuable scholarly contributions of the book is to show that it was only in the late 1960s, long after Quine developed the central tenets of his philosophy, that he began using the word "naturalism" to describe it."[3]
- Reviewed: [[]]
Improved to Good Article status by Alduin2000 (talk). Self-nominated at 16:50, 27 September 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
@Alduin2000 Good article. Personally I find alt1 to be a more interesting hook than the first one but i can still approve the nomination nonetheless. Since this seems to be your second nomination no QPQ is required. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:55, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
- Onegreatjoke, I'm happy to go with alt1 rather than the other hook. Thinking about it, alt1 is less vague and more concretely stated so is probably a better pick. Thanks for reviewing! Alduin2000 (talk) 17:20, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
@Alduin2000 Good article. Personally I find alt1 to be a more interesting hook than the first one but i can still approve the nomination nonetheless. Since this seems to be your second nomination no QPQ is required.