- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this section. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:59, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
- ... that a jury once rushed out of the courtroom of the first Chief Justice of the Arizona Territorial Supreme Court, William F. Turner, to attend to an Indian attack? Source:[1]
ALT1:... that William F. Turner, the first Chief Justice of the Arizona Territorial Supreme Court, brought his guns to court after a session was interrupted by an Indian attack? Source: [2] ALT2:... that Arizona Territorial Supreme Court Justice William F. Turner had to rule based on "general principles" since Congress had not funded a law library in the territory for legal research.
5x expanded by MB (talk) and Allen3 (talk). Nominated by MB (talk) at 19:59, 19 June 2019 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
- Have to WP:AGF regarding hook ALT2, as it is behind a subscription wall.
Overall:
Significant expansion, within the time limit allowed began when
RFD (
talk · contribs) made
this edit on 19 June 2019, and was completed when the same editor made
this edit on 20 June.
Allen3 (
talk · contribs)
last edited this article in 2014, which is outside of the eligibility criteria. Otherwise expansion, is
clear and valid. Therefore for it to be within the eligibility criteria I am not crediting that editor's work when reviewing this nomination. ECD only found a ~10% rating, so it's good to go on plagiarism. While the article needs some copy editing before it is nominated for GA, the
well written criteria is not part of a DYKN, and thus I do not see any hurdles that need to be passed by this article at this time. Of the hooks I prefer the main one. ALT1 is correct, but due to the wording it maybe construed that a Native American attacked the court, not a herd outside of the court as is what is written in the
source (page 247). ALT2, is verified to an item which is behind a subscription wall, and thus is valid per
WP:AGF but not preferred by this reviewer because of that.
RightCowLeftCoast (
Moo) 03:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Significant expansion, within the time limit allowed began when RFD (talk · contribs) made this edit on 19 June 2019, and was completed when the same editor made this edit on 20 June. Allen3 (talk · contribs) last edited this article in 2014, which is outside of the eligibility criteria. Otherwise expansion, is clear and valid. Therefore for it to be within the eligibility criteria I am not crediting that editor's work when reviewing this nomination. ECD only found a ~10% rating, so it's good to go on plagiarism. While the article needs some copy editing before it is nominated for GA, the well written criteria is not part of a DYKN, and thus I do not see any hurdles that need to be passed by this article at this time. Of the hooks I prefer the main one. ALT1 is correct, but due to the wording it maybe construed that a Native American attacked the court, not a herd outside of the court as is what is written in the source (page 247). ALT2, is verified to an item which is behind a subscription wall, and thus is valid per WP:AGF but not preferred by this reviewer because of that. RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 03:09, 28 June 2019 (UTC)