Template:Did you know nominations/White Foxes

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 13:04, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

White Foxes edit

Created by Ruby2010 (talk). Self nominated at 19:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC).

  • The article is new enough, long enough, was nominated in time, and is neutral. So basically it checks out, but there are some minor issues I want sorted before passing. I don't find the original hook any interesting (and it needs an inline citation if approved), so I'd prefer the ALT hook, which is supported by an inline citation. I don't know if it is common practice in song-articles, but I would like you to rewrite some of the paraphrasing into prose, like the sectios about Pitchfork media and Daniel D'amour. Mentoz86 (talk) 08:16, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Thanks for reviewing. I have trimmed/converted the two sections you referred to to prose. I am fine with the alt hook being promoted. Let me know if there is anything else (I am also new to song articles). Ruby 2010/2013 19:58, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Great, the ALT-hook is good to go. Good job. Mentoz86 (talk) 09:31, 25 June 2013 (UTC)