Template:Did you know nominations/Wheal Eliza Mine

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 10:40, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Wheal Eliza Mine edit

Created by Rodw (talk). Self nominated at 20:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC).

  • The article is long enough at 2692 characters per tool. It is new enough, having been nominated the same day it was created. There are neither copyvio nor close paraphrasing concerns per dup detector . I assume good faith for the one offline source. However, I can't get this source to load either in firefox or in chrome. Is there a problem with the URL? The hook is hooky enough, otherwise compliant, and appears in the article. The only issue with that is that the hook is not followed immediately by an inline source. If these two issues are fixed everything will be good to go.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 16:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
The Victoria County Histpry link is wierd - I see a load of code. It is a word document I got from a google which appears to be blocked and I can't post it here [url=http://www.victoriacountyhistory.ac.uk/explore/sites/explore/files/explore_assets/2010/03/22/Wheal_Eliza.doc I've tried shortening it down to this address] - lets see if it works here. I've reused a couple of refs which both support the discovery of the body.— Rod talk 17:00, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
  • Both of the problems I noted are now fixed, and this is good to go!— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 17:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)