Template:Did you know nominations/Watch n' Learn

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:40, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Watch n' Learn

edit

Created/expanded by 1111tomica (talk). Self nom at 17:26, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

  • New enough and long enough at the time of nomination. Article is completely supported by inline citations. Plagiarism check here, here, here, here. No problems identified. I've read it three times. I feel like it reads as a bit promotional at time, but I'm not certain how this can be avoided if the critical reception has been positive and there wasn't much drama in creating the song. all images have an acceptable copyright tag or fair use rationale. Hook I think is properly formatted.
  • Hook is supported by text of article which is supported by a fact in the article but I think it is a little ambiguous and the hook is not clear. What the hook actually means is: "A review of Rihanna's "Watch n' Learn" compared it to Beyoncé Knowles' 2011 song "Party", which is different than what my interpretation as a a reader would be of the songs being connected beyond a review. Can an Alt hook be proposed? --LauraHale (talk) 04:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Alt1 should be good to go. It should be properly formatted in version above (thought please check?) and is interesting enough and supported by inline citation. --LauraHale (talk) 21:32, 22 April 2012 (UTC)