- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:57, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
WQFX (AM)
5x expanded by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 23:41, 24 December 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Hello, Sammi Brie, nice work on the article. However, I'm not entirely sure if the hook meets criterion 4a, since this looks like it may focus too negatively on the person mentioned in the hook (this is my first time doing a review). Can you or somebody else share their thoughts? — Coolperson177 (t|c) 15:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Coolperson177: That's a good thought, but Holton Turnbough is dead (you might notice a mention of "Turnbough's estate" a bit later). See [1]. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:30, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, sorry. I think everything else looks good though, so I'll give this a
pass. — Coolperson177 (t|c) 17:39, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Tweaked ALT0 to
T:DYK/P5
Hello, Sammi Brie, nice work on the article. However, I'm not entirely sure if the hook meets criterion 4a, since this looks like it may focus too negatively on the person mentioned in the hook (this is my first time doing a review). Can you or somebody else share their thoughts? — Coolperson177 (t|c) 15:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
