The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 00:48, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

WFTV

Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 00:31, 22 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/WFTV; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: I don't see any problems here; the article is new enough based on its recent GA promotion, is certainly long enough, well-sourced, neutral, and no outstanding plagiarism to speak of. The hook is also cited and interesting (at least to me) and a QPQ is given. AGF on any paywalled information. Link20XX (talk) 02:46, 22 August 2023 (UTC)