- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 18:02, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Victor Wembanyama
Improved to Good Article status by Sportzeditz (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 23:27, 28 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Victor Wembanyama; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
@Onegreatjoke: I was the one who reviewed and promoted the article to GA, so I'm definitely willing to take over this nomination, as well! To be honest, everything looks fine, including your QPQ. I just think you could optimize the hook even more by focusing on the comparison between Wembanyama and Lebron, but this is mainly a suggestion, rather than a must. On a side note, was "being described him" a typo? That pronoun looks a bit weirdly-placed to me... Please, let me know what you think about this. Oltrepier (talk) 14:29, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Oltrepier: How about, ALT1: ... that Victor Wembanyama is regarded as one of the greatest NBA prospects of his generation even being described as the most anticipated prospect since LeBron James in 2003? Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:15, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: Nice, although I was thinking more about something like this:
- ALT2: ... that Victor Wembanyama has been described as the most anticipated NBA prospect since LeBron James in 2003?
- [Also, I slightly edited your previous message, so your own proposed hook can be recorded by the bot.] Oltrepier (talk) 19:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, I forgot to call for help from other reviewers in here... Oltrepier (talk) 10:01, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, Oltrepier, you can't review a DYK nom if you reviewed it for GA status as well. might we get another reviewer in here? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 02:30, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- theleekycauldron Sorry, I genuinely didn't know that... Good thing that I picked the red arrow over the green tick, then! : D Oltrepier (talk) 13:49, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- Reviewing jengod (talk) 02:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
| Length
|
Newness
|
Cited hook
|
Interest
|
Sources
|
Neutrality
|
Plagiarism/paraphrase
|
| ✔
|
✔
|
✔
|
✔
|
✔
|
✔
|
✔
|
I see no problems. All cited, earwig only tagged the LeBron quote, length/newness to good article are fine, etc.
@Onegreatjoke: I was the one who reviewed and promoted the article to GA, so I'm definitely willing to take over this nomination, as well! To be honest, everything looks fine, including your QPQ. I just think you could optimize the hook even more by focusing on the comparison between Wembanyama and Lebron, but this is mainly a suggestion, rather than a must. On a side note, was "being described him" a typo? That pronoun looks a bit weirdly-placed to me... Please, let me know what you think about this. Oltrepier (talk) 14:29, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
