Template:Did you know nominations/United States national kabaddi team

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:24, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

United States national kabaddi team edit

Created by ViperSnake151 (talk). Self-nominated at 01:04, 22 October 2016 (UTC).


  • No issues found with article, ready for human review.
    • This article is new and was created on 23:09, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
    • This article meets the DYK criteria at 5052 characters
    • All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
    • This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
    • ? A copyright violation is suspected by an automated tool, with 43.8% confidence. (confirm)
      • Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
  • No overall issues detected
    • The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 64 characters
    • The hook ALT1 is an appropriate length at 139 characters
    • The hook ALT2 is an appropriate length at 111 characters
    • ViperSnake151 has more than 5 DYK credits. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Mere Mete Whaanga was performed for this nomination.

Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This is not a substitute for a human review. Please report any issues with the bot. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 20:38, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

New as of the date of the nomination (created 21OCT). Primary hook is cited (to ESPN) and interesting and under character ceiling. QPQ done. No obvious copyvio. Article is long enough. Everything else checks. GTG on primary hook. LavaBaron (talk) 01:34, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
@LavaBaron: I was just going to promote this, but thought ALT1 much more interesting than the original hook. Did you intend to approve ALT1? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:36, 16 November 2016 (UTC)