Template:Did you know nominations/Tuber lijiangense, Tuber microspermum, Tuber microspiculatum, Tuber polyspermum, Tuber sinoalbidum, Tuber sinoexcavatum

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 23:39, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Tuber lijiangense, Tuber microspermum, Tuber microspiculatum, Tuber polyspermum, Tuber sinoalbidum, Tuber sinoexcavatum edit

Created/expanded by Sasata (talk). Self nom at 08:34, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Reviewed: Accept.

  • All six articles were created September 28 (good)
  • All six articles have body text > 1500 characters (good, didn't even measure the lead/references/figure legend)
  • All six articles look neutral and professionally written. A random check of partial sentences from three of the articles in Google turned up only the Wikipedia pages, and the article format seems well specialized for Wikipedia - plagiarism/copyright issues seem unlikely. Comparison to the one obvious (listed) source suggests text has been extensively rewritten.
  • Hook length under 200 characters, I've confirmed all six are indeed newly described in publications [1] [2][3] which makes the hook accurate. It is also interesting that so much good work has been done on this genus recently.

Wnt (talk) 02:54, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Just adding a tick to the above review so that the bots etc pick this one up. Miyagawa (talk) 19:16, 2 October 2012 (UTC)