Template:Did you know nominations/Tomb of Sikandar Lodi

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 4meter4 (talk) 04:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Tomb of Sikandar Lodi edit

Tomb of Sikandar Lodi
Tomb of Sikandar Lodi

5x expanded by AKS.9955 (talk). Self-nominated at 19:26, 6 November 2015 (UTC).

  • Date, hook, length, and sources all look good. — Hunter Kahn 03:32, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Hunter Kahn, your review does not cover standard checks such as neutrality and close paraphrasing. (I'm also not sure whether you've covered sourcing throughout or just the sourcing on the hook.) Please check these and complete the review. Many thanks. Also, the hook has grammatical issues ("is earliest") and is repetitious ("is the tomb of Sikandar Lodi" should probably be deleted); here's a suggested (and shorter) alt hook that fixes these issues:
  • The article is neutral and the sources are fine. I checked for close paraphrasing and didn't find any problems. I must have skimmed over the grammatical error in the hook, but that was easy enough to fix and I see you've already done so. The review is complete. — Hunter Kahn 18:25, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks, Hunter Kahn. Striking original version of hook with the error. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:14, 7 November 2015 (UTC)