Template:Did you know nominations/Tikal Temple VI

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 16:54, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Tikal Temple VI

(

• Back to T:TDYK
• Article history

)

• ... that Temple VI at the Maya city of Tikal, which has a lengthy hieroglyphic text inscribed on its roof comb, probably wasn't a temple at all?

• Reviewed: Toothcomb

Created/expanded by Simon Burchell (talk). Self nom at 19:09, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

• Article length, age, etc. and hook OK. Offline sources accepted in good faith. There's seems to be something wrong with the image on this page, but the licencing looks appropriate as well. Guettarda (talk) 12:18, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

• ALT1:... that despite its name, there is speculation that Temple VI at the Maya city of Tikal was not a temple? --PFHLai (talk) 16:17, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

That sounds much better to me, I'd go with that. Simon Burchell (talk) 16:24, 17 March 2012 (UTC)