Template:Did you know nominations/The Redfield Hoard

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 23:42, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

The Redfield Hoard

Created by Bruxton (talk). Self-nominated at 01:10, 18 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/The Redfield Hoard; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Article is new enough and long enough. It's neutral and well-referenced. QPQ done. The section choices could be improved as there is one large background section which doesn't seem to be background and a history section that appears to be misnamed. The hook is interesting, correctly formatted, and short enough. Earwig reports a low chance of copyright infringement, however, most of the sources are behind paywalls so AGF on that. The hook is supported by an inline reference that is behind a paywall so AGF on it. Could the hook sentence incorporate Nevada and 1974 please? Philafrenzy (talk) 19:26, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
@Philafrenzy: Thank you very much for the review. I have reworked and rarranged parts of the article and corrected the section heading for history. Bruxton (talk) 22:53, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
Hi @Philafrenzy:, a long time has passed since the corrections, please let me know what else I need to do for the nomination. I also made the source public on July 18. Thanks, Bruxton (talk) 00:01, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
Philafrenzy (talk) 21:40, 31 July 2023 (UTC)