Template:Did you know nominations/The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 13:03, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari edit

Improved to Good Article status by Hunter Kahn (talk). Nominated by Calvin999 (talk) at 20:24, 21 April 2015 (UTC).

  • Recent GA (21st), long enough, neutral, no copyvio found via spot check (though most sources are offline), QPQ done but is insufficient—it needs to actually address the points of the DYK review or else it won't be promoted. This hook might be improved by explaining a little bit more what about the movie made it a premonition of Hitler. I don't think that would sacrifice any of its mystique. Article has a bunch of Harv errors (try User:Ucucha/HarvErrors). Hook has three immediate refs in article (3b) but all are offline, so I assume good faith. Hats off to the editors—nice work! Please ping me if I don't respond. czar  03:15, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Done a more thorough review. (Though I have seen hooks promoted with reviews consisting of "Passes all criteria, GTG"). Lol. Here is a revised hook:
@Hunter Kahn, can you confirm from the sources that the conformist/revolutionary description is a reference to the film's themes and not to the film being revolutionary within cinema itself? czar  14:01, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Yes it refers to the themess. I do not necessarily believe the new alt hook is quite right, however, because I think Kracauer argues the movie started out revolutionary and became conformist, not that it was both simultaneously. Maybe something like the below hook instead? — Hunter Kahn 16:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
ALT2 works for me. Checks out with text, but agf since the refs are offline. Please do fix the aforementioned Harv errors via that script when you have a chance. czar  17:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand what the HARV errors are.  — ₳aron 13:02, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
I fixed a few of those problems with these changes. Should be all OK now, but a second look wouldn't hurt. GermanJoe (talk) 15:45, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
all resolved, gtg czar  15:55, 24 April 2015 (UTC)