- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:48, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
TWA Hotel edit
- ... that the Eero Saarinen-designed TWA Flight Center airport terminal was designated a landmark and is being redeveloped into the TWA Hotel at John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York City?
- ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
Created by Vanguard10 (talk) and Epicgenius (talk). Nominated by Vanguard10 (talk) at 01:30, 26 December 2017 (UTC).
This article seems to have been written without realizing there is already an article on the Eero Saarinen terminal, TWA Flight Center. And that article already has some content on the plan to turn the terminal into a hotel. It seems to me that whatever content is new here should be merged into that article, and "TWA Hotel" can be a redirect into it. Or if you think there really should be a separate article on the hotel, discuss that at Talk:TWA Flight Center with other editors and gain a consensus. Wasted Time R (talk) 11:45, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
@Epicgenius: has made some improvements to this article, and after discussion I think this article can remain stand-alone. So going back to a DYK review for it (and adding Epicgenius as a contributor to it): Article creation date and filing date okay. Article length okay at 2088B (340 words) readable prose size. Article neutrality and sourcing okay. I spot-checked a few phrases from the article and didn't see any copyvio's. Hook length just makes it at 199 characters, hook interest is good (it's a famous terminal), hook neutrality is okay, and hook sourcing is readily clear. QPQ doesn't apply since think this may be the creator's first DYK nomination. Image licensing is okay.
- I didn't know about QPQ but I can start out by reviewing another person's DYK along with a disclaimer about being a novice reviewer. I will refer to the guidelines and also comments made here, such as to check things. Vanguard10 (talk) 04:00, 27 December 2017 (UTC) EDIT: I have started Harris DeVane, DYK listed on December 25.
- A couple of minor comments on the article text itself – "adds" in the first paragraph should be "adding"; and "are being replaced" in the next-to-last paragraph is ambiguous as to whether they are being replaced with the original design or with an alternate design (from the source it's the former). But this article is now okay to go for DYK. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wasted Time R (talk • contribs) 01:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
