Template:Did you know nominations/Synoeca septentrionalis

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Rcsprinter123 (indicate) @ 19:56, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Synoeca septentrionalis edit

Created by RJPet (talk). Self nominated at 20:40, 21 October 2014 (UTC).

The article is new enough, long enough, and reliably sourced. Pay-walled sources taken afg, and no policy issues detected in the open access references. I am reticent of either of the hooks as they seem more specific then the cited reference, and only use one of the pain scales available.--Kevmin § 04:23, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Unless there is interaction soon on the questions raised, I will suggest failing this nom.--Kevmin § 03:38, 28 November 2014 (UTC)