Template:Did you know nominations/Susquehecka Creek

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 07:40, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Susquehecka Creek edit

Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self-nominated at 18:41, 30 December 2015 (UTC).

  • Grammar edit. Gimme a sec. — LlywelynII 05:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Well, ok, the present hook is wrong, but there's sourcing on a similar one. Fix'd. — LlywelynII 05:06, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
  • New enough at time of submission; long enough (~3900 elig. char.); neutral and seemingly non-controversial; sourced; Earwig finds low probability of copyvio. Present hook clocks in at 161 char.; moderately interesting and now factually and grammatically accurate; no BIO issues. Sourced; verified; and, while page doesn't mention it, source notes that the "everyone" was 24 people, not just the three or four listed in the article. G2G. — LlywelynII 05:15, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Note: For the promoter: be aware that this form of the hook is approved, but some well-meaning but utterly mistaken editors are mangling it without discussion. Kindly be sure that the accurate hook is the one being used for the front page. Cf. MOS:COMMA. — LlywelynII 05:57, 8 January 2016 (UTC)