Template:Did you know nominations/Statue of James II, Trafalgar Square

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:55, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Statue of James II, Trafalgar Square edit

  • ... that James II lay on his back for a year amid grass and weeds after he was overthrown to make way for Edward VII?

5x expanded by Prioryman (talk), Another Believer (talk), Ham (talk). Nominated by Prioryman (talk) at 22:51, 29 November 2014 (UTC).

  • New enough, long enough, expanded more than five fold.. The hook isn't exactly what's written in the article. An alternate would be "that James II lay on his back for more than a year amid grass and weeds..." etc. Kerowyn Leave a note 07:14, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
  • I think it's a pretty fair reflection of what's in the article. The statue was taken down (=overthrown - an archaic usage) to make way for Edward VII's coronation stands. The advantage of including it is that there is a double pun in the hook - that James II was overthrown to make way for Edward VII (rather than William of Orange) and that he lay on his back for a year afterwards. Prioryman (talk) 08:41, 30 November 2014 (UTC)