Template:Did you know nominations/Sheila Callender

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:01, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Sheila Callender edit

Created by 97198 (talk). Self-nominated at 02:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC).

  • Newly created article with 418 words of readable prose size. No plagiarism or POV issue detected. QPQ has been provided. Meets the one inline citation per para criterion. The hook fact uses all the four citations present in the article of which I could check three. They recognise Callender's work in establishing haematology. Are you sure that the "distinct medical discipline" part can be used here? I'm sorry if I appear to be nitpicky. --Skr15081997 (talk) 10:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
  • @Skr15081997: That was how I interpreted it, but I understand that it's not the exact wording used in the sources. If you're concerned we could just reword the hook:
  • This is a perfectly fine hook and is supported by citations present in the article. Good to Go. --Skr15081997 (talk) 09:39, 10 October 2017 (UTC)